<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dale Earnhardt Sr.&#8217;s 1998 Commemorative Die-cast a COT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080</link>
	<description>Home of the FREE Stock Car Gazette E-zine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 01:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew</title>
		<link>http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080/comment-page-1#comment-189496</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080#comment-189496</guid>
		<description>i agree with the fact that teresa is milking dales name for every penny she can i mean i miss the #3 on the track but it should only be driven by an earnhardt and not some kid that came from say new york or just because its richard childresses grand son let the 3 be. and stop trying to make new items like the dale sr. cot that is a disrespectful thing to do in his memory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with the fact that teresa is milking dales name for every penny she can i mean i miss the #3 on the track but it should only be driven by an earnhardt and not some kid that came from say new york or just because its richard childresses grand son let the 3 be. and stop trying to make new items like the dale sr. cot that is a disrespectful thing to do in his memory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080/comment-page-1#comment-161986</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080#comment-161986</guid>
		<description>I think that 2008 car of Dale&#039;s is not right! they shouldn&#039;t make any other cars of his except the ones from 1979-2001! I bought a 1:64 scale die cast 2001 Monte Carlo (the one he died in) two months before that race, and now it sits in that tin worth a lot of money, and no I&#039;m not selling it to nobody! but that 2008 model doesn&#039;t look right if you ask me I think it is a disgrace to Dale! I don&#039;t like NASCAR&#039;s stupid rules nowadays the drivers can&#039;t bump around anymore unless it is an accident I mean what the hell, NASCAR used to be funner back in the day when all drivers especially Earnhardt had to bump and run to get to the front of the pack in order to win the race, I think it is stupid they had to change it NASCAR was more entertaining back then if you ask me when Earnhardt was still racing! Go Dale Jr.! I want to see you hoist that Sprint Cup trophy over your head this year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that 2008 car of Dale&#8217;s is not right! they shouldn&#8217;t make any other cars of his except the ones from 1979-2001! I bought a 1:64 scale die cast 2001 Monte Carlo (the one he died in) two months before that race, and now it sits in that tin worth a lot of money, and no I&#8217;m not selling it to nobody! but that 2008 model doesn&#8217;t look right if you ask me I think it is a disgrace to Dale! I don&#8217;t like NASCAR&#8217;s stupid rules nowadays the drivers can&#8217;t bump around anymore unless it is an accident I mean what the hell, NASCAR used to be funner back in the day when all drivers especially Earnhardt had to bump and run to get to the front of the pack in order to win the race, I think it is stupid they had to change it NASCAR was more entertaining back then if you ask me when Earnhardt was still racing! Go Dale Jr.! I want to see you hoist that Sprint Cup trophy over your head this year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Abrams</title>
		<link>http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080/comment-page-1#comment-158702</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Abrams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080#comment-158702</guid>
		<description>I have seen elsewhere that the kids do have a financial stake in the company. It may be small, but that is what I read. Now, if that was a mistake, then so be it. I have no problem with admitting that if what I read was not correct. I am not refusing to see any facts, it may be that the facts are just a bit blurry right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen elsewhere that the kids do have a financial stake in the company. It may be small, but that is what I read. Now, if that was a mistake, then so be it. I have no problem with admitting that if what I read was not correct. I am not refusing to see any facts, it may be that the facts are just a bit blurry right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwsp3</title>
		<link>http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080/comment-page-1#comment-157741</link>
		<dc:creator>gwsp3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080#comment-157741</guid>
		<description>Chuck Abrams-How do you know Dale Earnhardt left the company, in part, to the children. Where is your proof? It is a matter of public record that the company was left solely to Mrs. Earnhardt. You need positive proof before you make a statement like you just did. Your statement is so typical of the blind leading the blind and refusing to see the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Abrams-How do you know Dale Earnhardt left the company, in part, to the children. Where is your proof? It is a matter of public record that the company was left solely to Mrs. Earnhardt. You need positive proof before you make a statement like you just did. Your statement is so typical of the blind leading the blind and refusing to see the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fran</title>
		<link>http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080/comment-page-1#comment-157739</link>
		<dc:creator>Fran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080#comment-157739</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know where PJ Force had to pay $100 to get Dale&#039;s autograph but I never did.  My husband and I were married on 4/29/00.  My parents sent Dale an invitation to the wedding and asked him to autograph it.  He did and it is now framed and hanging next to my bridal portrait and never cost us a dime except for the postage to mail it.  
No, I won&#039;t be buying the &quot;COT&quot; car because it is wrong to put that number on something he never drove.  Just as it is wrong for na$crap to say that Dale was a 7 time nextel/sprint champion.  If B. France wants to &quot;go back to the way it used to be&quot;, he needs to start there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know where PJ Force had to pay $100 to get Dale&#8217;s autograph but I never did.  My husband and I were married on 4/29/00.  My parents sent Dale an invitation to the wedding and asked him to autograph it.  He did and it is now framed and hanging next to my bridal portrait and never cost us a dime except for the postage to mail it.<br />
No, I won&#8217;t be buying the &#8220;COT&#8221; car because it is wrong to put that number on something he never drove.  Just as it is wrong for na$crap to say that Dale was a 7 time nextel/sprint champion.  If B. France wants to &#8220;go back to the way it used to be&#8221;, he needs to start there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Abrams</title>
		<link>http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080/comment-page-1#comment-157655</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Abrams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://motorsportsnews.net/archives/1080#comment-157655</guid>
		<description>2 things -- I agree 100%. First a chocolate bar and now this.

Secondly, Big E did leave the company, in part, to the kids. They D have a financial stake in DEI and is why they continue to want it to succeed. They just could not work with Teresa any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 things &#8212; I agree 100%. First a chocolate bar and now this.</p>
<p>Secondly, Big E did leave the company, in part, to the kids. They D have a financial stake in DEI and is why they continue to want it to succeed. They just could not work with Teresa any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

